Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size   Users Online: 315
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 130-135

Management of complete impacted maxillary second deciduous molar with the aid of cone-beam computed tomography: Case report and a review of the literature


1 Orthodontic Section, Department of Dentistry Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
3 Radiology Section, Department of Dentistry Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
4 Endodontics Section, Department of Dentistry Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

Date of Web Publication17-Dec-2013

Correspondence Address:
Hayder A Hashim
Hamad Medical Corporation, Rumaila Hospital, Dental Centre, P.O. Box - 3050, Doha
Qatar
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0203.123201

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Complete impaction of primary teeth is a very rare condition and less seen at the dental office compared with permanent dentition. To report the use of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of a 7-year-old boy with completely impacted maxillary second deciduous molar due to the presence of odontoma and a cystic lesion.

Keywords: Cyst, impaction, odontoma, primary second maxillary molar


How to cite this article:
Hashim HA, Al-Qahtani AA, Taha SM, Tharupeedikayil S, Ahmed MF. Management of complete impacted maxillary second deciduous molar with the aid of cone-beam computed tomography: Case report and a review of the literature. J Orthodont Sci 2013;2:130-5

How to cite this URL:
Hashim HA, Al-Qahtani AA, Taha SM, Tharupeedikayil S, Ahmed MF. Management of complete impacted maxillary second deciduous molar with the aid of cone-beam computed tomography: Case report and a review of the literature. J Orthodont Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Sep 22];2:130-5. Available from: http://www.jorthodsci.org/text.asp?2013/2/4/130/123201


  Introduction and Review of Literature Top


Tooth impaction is defined as a condition where the tooth failed to erupt due to a mechanical blocking and the tooth remains unerupted beyond its normal time of eruption. [1]

The prevalence rate of impacted primary teeth was found to be from 1.3% to 8.9% of the population with a significantly higher incidence between siblings. [2],[3],[4] In general, primary mandibular molars are affected more than 10 times as often as primary maxillary molars. [5]

The pediatric dentists face the problem of impaction of permanent teeth more often than that of primary one. Impaction of an anterior primary tooth is very rare. On the other hand, total impaction is a very rare condition. [6],[7],[8]

The impaction may be primary, where the teeth never have been erupted (also called primary failure of eruption) or it may be secondary, where the teeth after eruption become impacted again due to several factors. The primary failure of eruption is diagnosed when the unerupted tooth is covered by an intact mucosa and radiographs reveal the tooth to be deeply buried in the jaw bone. [9] The secondary failure of eruption is when the permanent tooth is prevented from eruption due to retained deciduous tooth, odontomas, cystic lesion and supernumerary tooth.

Impaction is caused by systemic or local etiologic factors. [10] Local factors that contribute in impaction include developmental anomalies such as malposition, dilaceration, ankylosis, tumors, odontoma, dentigerous cysts and supernumerary teeth, whereas systemic-genetic interrelation factors could be due to cleidocranial dysostosis and hypopituitarism. [11],[12]

Most of the early reported cases of impacted primary teeth were found to be due to the presence of odontomas. [10] Odontoma is an odontogenic tumor, which often causes disturbances in the eruption of teeth such as impaction, delayed eruption or retention of primary teeth. [13],[14] Various locations of the odontomas associated with primary molars were reported in the literature, between the roots of a right lower second primary molar, between the crowns of the upper first and second primary molars, above the tooth crown of the lower right primary second molar and above the unerupted upper second primary molar. [11],[15]

In the United States, a large-scale survey analyzed odontoma detection rates. The result of the analysis revealed that one-third of all cases were identified in children between 11 and 15 years, whereas the detection rate in those below the age of 5 years was 2% of all cases which was very low. [16]

Impaction of primary molars leads to several problems in the dental arch includes: Space loss, tipping of adjacent teeth, supra eruption of the antagonist and failure of eruption of the permanent teeth. [6],[10],[17]

Several treatment options were recommended for impacted deciduous or permanent tooth including extraction of the primary tooth and patient follow-up without treatment. However, the eruption process should be under the supervision. [18] The other treatment option is surgical exposure or surgical repositioning with or without orthodontic traction. On the other hand, in some cases surgical removal of the impacted permanent tooth was performed. [19] When the odontomas were found to be the cause, the treatment of choice is the surgical removal in both primary and permanent dentition. If the odontomas are removed early without causing any disturbance of the underlying tooth germ, this will lead to spontaneous eruption of the impacted teeth, whereas in other cases orthodontic traction is required. [12],[20],[21] Further, the underlying impacted teeth are sometimes extracted in association with the removal of the odontomas. [22] Furthermore, in patient when only removing the odontoma; the primary molar will be kept under observation to monitor its eruption.

In literature, few cases of total impacted maxillary second deciduous molars were presented. The aim of this paper was to present the management of a patient with complete impacted maxillary second deciduous molar.


  Case Report Top


We report a case of 7-year-old boy patient attended the orthodontic clinic regarding his missing teeth in the upper right buccal segment and his medical history was non-contributory.


  Intra Oral Examination Top


On examination, the patient has severe gagging reflex. Intraoral examination revealed that the patient is in the primary dentition stage. Although the patient was 7-year-old, all first permanent first molars were unerupted. All the primary teeth except for the maxillary right deciduous second molar were present in the mouth.


  Radiographic Examination and Findings Top


Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed. Panoramic image revealed the presence of all permanent teeth and deciduous teeth in both jaws except the third molars. The maxillary right second deciduous molar with full root development was pushed very close to the floor of the maxillary sinus. The crown of the permanent second premolar was located in a superior and lateral position in relation to the crown of the impacted primary maxillary second molar [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Panoramic image showed presence of all primary, permanent teeth and the impacted upper right primary second molar and its proximity to the floor of the maxillary sinus

Click here to view


Right lateral view showed the impacted maxillary right primary second molar and the crown of the successor permanent second premolar [Figure 2]. There was an oval shaped cystic lesion (radiolucent area) with an odontoma (radio-opaque structure) in the right maxillary region as well as second deciduous molar impaction [Figure 3]. At 2 mm cuts image revealed the crown of the maxillary right second premolar and the impacted maxillary right second deciduous molar. A radio-opaque structure (odontoma) was present above the tooth crown of the maxillary right second deciduous molar.
Figure 2: Right lateral view showing the impacted maxillary right primary second molar and the crown of the permanent second premolar

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a‑c) 2 mm cuts radiographic view showing the impacted maxillary right primary second molar, radio‑opaque mass (odontoma) was present above the crown of the maxillary right primary second molar and the crown of the maxillary right second premolar in addition to the cystic lesion (radiolucent area)

Click here to view


Three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction supported the findings as the tooth like structure, cystic lesion as well as thinning of the cortical plate with occlusal perforation. Clover-shaped radiolucency was observed associated with the maxillary deciduous second molar, the permanent second premolar and the odontoma. The lesion was more buccally and the palatal bone was intact [Figure 4] and [Figure 5].
Figure 4: (a and b) Three‑dimensional reconstruction view showing the impacted maxillary right primary second molar, radio‑opaque mass (odontoma) was present above the crown of the maxillary right primary second molar and also the crown of the maxillary right second premolar

Click here to view
Figure 5: Three‑dimensional volume rendered image of the cystic lesion (red arrows, (a) photograph) in addition to occlusal perforation (pink arrow (b) photograph)

Click here to view


Multiplanner image exhibited clover shaped radiolucency with well-defined margin with a sclerotic rim and small radiopaque odontomas like structure [Figure 6] and [Figure 7].
Figure 6: (a and b) Multiplanner image: Closer view of the cystic lesion (a) and the odontoma (b)

Click here to view
Figure 7: Multiplanner relations: Different positions with different sections

Click here to view


The measurement of the cyst was 13.75 mm × 9.57 mm while of the odontoma was 5 mm × 6 mm [Figure 8].
Figure 8: Showing the measurements of the cystic lesion (13.75 mm × 9.57 mm) and the odontoma (5 mm × 6 mm)

Click here to view



  Diagnosis Top


The provisional diagnosis was; odontoma and cystic lesion impeding the eruption of the maxillary right second deciduous molar and the successor permanent second premolar.


  Treatment Objectives Top


  • Removal of the impacted maxillary second deciduous molar, odontoma and the cystic lesion.
  • Regular follow-up every 6 months to monitor the remaining apical third of the palatal root and the eruption of the successor maxillary right permanent second premolar.



  Surgical Operation Top


Patient was referred to the oral and maxillofacial surgery department. The odontoma and the cystic lesion were surgically removed under general anesthesia along with the maxillary second deciduous molar to create a clear path of eruption to the successor permanent second premolar. During the surgical removal of the maxillary second deciduous molar; the dilacerated apical third of the palatal root was broken. The oral surgeon decided to leave the broken part in order to avoid more tissue damage and/or development of oroanteral fistula.


  Post-Surgical Follow-up Top


The recovery was uneventful and intraoral healing was satisfactory. Patient was followed-up regularly to monitor the remaining apical third of the palatal root and the eruption of the successor maxillary right permanent second premolar.

At 3 months follow-up after surgery; another CBCT was performed. The images revealed the presence of the dilacerated fractured remaining palatal root located very close to the floor of the maxillary sinus, the healing area of the odontoma and the cystic lesion as well as the slight movement of the successor maxillary right permanent second premolar [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11].
Figure 9: Right lateral cone‑beam computed tomography image showing the remaining palatal root (green arrow) and the slight occlusal movement of the permanent second premolar (red arrow) 3 months
after surgical removal of the odontoma, the cystic lesion and the second maxillary deciduous molar (pink arrow)


Click here to view
Figure 10: Panoramic image showing the remaining fractured palatal root of the maxillary second deciduous molar (green arrow) and the slight occlusal movement of the maxillary second permanent premolar (red arrow) 3 months postoperatively

Click here to view
Figure 11: Close view showing the fractured apical part of the palatal root of the maxillary second deciduous molar very close to the floor of the maxillary sinus (green arrow), the healing area after removal of the odontoma and the cystic lesion (pink arrow) and occlusal movement of the right permanent maxillary premolar (red arrow)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


As mentioned earlier, tooth impaction occur more commonly in the permanent dentition and rarely in the primary dentition. [23],[24] However, there are very few reports in the literature of odontomas associated with unerupted primary teeth. [12],[15],[25],[26]

The etiology of impaction is still not known. [27],[28] However, scanning electron microscopy studies of the root surfaces of extracted teeth revealed that most of these teeth were ankylosed. [6],[29] The cause of the ankylosis is typically not clear, but few studies suggested that genetic factor may contribute to ankylosis. [2],[3],[27],[30]

Memarpour et al.[31] reported a case of impacted primary molars positioned inferior to the succeeding premolars due to ankylosis. However, in the present case the odontoma and the cystic lesion were the cause of impaction and not ankylosis.

Based on the radiographic findings, surgical extraction of the impacted maxillary primary second molar, the cystic lesion and the odontoma was planned in order to facilitate the eruption of the second premolar. The treatment plan performed in the present case is in agreement with Ten Cate, Thornton and Zimmerman and Biederman who all recommended early tooth extraction for the treatment of impacted teeth [32],[33],[34] and in disagreement with Mcdonald et al. [35] who recommended, if the co-operation of patients is obtained, observation as the best treatment option since some impacted teeth may exfoliate while the rest may require extraction. In the present case report, the cystic lesion and the odontoma were surgically removed as well as the impacted maxillary second primary tooth.

Previous case reports relied mostly on periapical views and orthopantomograph (OPG). In the present case report, the CBCT was utilized. This technique has several advantages and benefits compared to the periapical and OPG radiographs. In the case of apical-third fractures of the root, there is usually no mobility and the tooth may remain asymptomatic. Furthermore, it has been observed that the apical segment of a transversely fractured tooth remains vital in most of the cases. Thus, no treatment is required and a watch and observe policy is advocated. If the dental pulp becomes necrotic in the apical fragment, surgical removal of the apical fragment is indicated. [36] Gündüz et al. [37] reported an incident of a minor communication with the maxillary sinus (oroanteral fistula) during removal of the impacted maxillary deciduous molar. In the present case report, the fractured dilacerated apical third of the palatal root was left to avoid such complication until it is either resorbed by itself or kept under regular follow-up.

Based in the above information and in addition to the low exposure to radiation, it is recommended to take an OPG or CBCT at the age of 7-8 years (early mixed dentition stage). This is essential for the early detection and localization of any abnormality such as odontoma, congenital absent teeth, cystic lesions and supernumerary teeth. Once a diagnosis is made, a proper treatment plan can be devised.

Interestingly, orthodontic therapy is not usually necessary because most odontomas are very small and its influence on occlusion is negligible and improvement without orthodontic therapy can take place. [38],[39] However, in some cases after extraction of the impacted tooth and removal of the odontoma; orthodontic treatment can be performed to regain the lost space for the successor permanent tooth which should be monitored. If it does not erupt spontaneously, orthodontic traction procedure can be used.


  Conclusions Top


The earlier detection and removal of odontoma and cystic lesion associated with the impaction of teeth might give better results for achieving good occlusion and obtaining proper function. In addition, using CBCT system in some cases is highly recommended. Dentists should prescribe CBCT imaging only when they expect that the diagnostic yield will benefit the patient care, enhance patient safety or improve clinical outcomes significantly. This technology provides the dental clinician with an imaging modality capable of providing a 3-D representation of the maxillofacial skeleton with a high quality, minimal distortion and low radiation.

 
  References Top

1.Yildirim-Oz G, Tosun G, Kiziloglu D, Durmuº E, Sener Y. An unusual association of odontomas with primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2007;1:45-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Kurol J. Infraocclusion of primary molars: An epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981;9:94-102.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Douglass J, Tinanoff N. The etiology, prevalence and sequelae of infraocclusion of primary molars. J Dent Child 1991;58:481-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Dewhurst SN, Harris JC, Bedi R. Infraocclusion of primary molars in monozygotic twins: Report of two cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997;7:25-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 6 th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1997. p. 198-205.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Antoniades K, Kavadia S, Milioti K, Antoniades V, Markovitsi E. Submerged teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;26:239-42.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Brunetto AR, Turley PK, Brunetto AP, Regattieri LR, Nicolau GV. Impaction of a primary maxillary canine by an odontoma: Surgical and orthodontic management. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:301-2.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Borsatto MC, Sant'Anna AT, Niero H, Soares UN, Pardini LC. Unerupted second primary mandibular molar positioned inferior to the second premolar: Case report. Pediatr Dent 1999;21:205-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Winter GB, Gelbier MJ, Goodman JR. Severe Infra-occlusion and failed eruption of deciduous molars associated with eruptive and developmental disturbances in the permanent dentition: A report of 28 selected cases. Br J Orthod 1997;24:149-57.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Otsuka Y, Mitomi T, Tomizawa M, Noda T. A review of clinical features in 13 cases of impacted primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Snawder KD. Delayed eruption of the anterior primary teeth and their management: Report of a case. ASDC J Dent Child 1974;41:382-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Motokawa W, Braham RL, Morris ME, Tanaka M. Surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment of an unerupted primary maxillary second molar impacted by an odontoma and a dentigerous cyst: A case report. Quintessence Int 1990;21:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Morning P. Impacted teeth in relation to odontomas. Int J Oral Surg 1980;9:81-91.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Budnick SD. Compound and complex odontomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976;42:501-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Stajcic ZZ. Odontoma associated with a primary tooth. J Pedod 1988;12:415-20.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Katz RW. An analysis of compound and complex odontomas. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56:445-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Kjaer I, Fink-Jensen M, Andreasen JO. Classification and sequelae of arrested eruption of primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:11-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Frank CA. Treatment options for impacted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:623-32.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Murray P, Brown NL. The conservative approach to managing unerupted lower premolars - Two case reports. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:198-203.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Kaugars GE, Miller ME, Abbey LM. Odontomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:172-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Tandon S, Radhika M. Compound composite odontoma in primary dentition - A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1998;16:111-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.Torreti EF, Carrel R. Compound odontoma in a twelve-year-old girl. ASDC J Dent Child 1983;50:376-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Kramer RM, Williams AC. The incidence of impacted teeth. A survey at Harlem hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970;29:237-41.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Bimstein E. Root dilaceration and stunting in two unerupted primary incisors. ASDC J Dent Child 1978;45:223-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Haishima K, Haishima H, Yamada Y, Tomizawa M, Noda T, Suzuki M. Compound odontomes associated with impacted maxillary primary central incisors: Report of two cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 1994;4:251-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Kilpatrick NM, Hardman PJ, Welbury RR. Dilaceration of a primary tooth. Int J Paediatr Dent 1991;1:151-3.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Allsopp P, Johns M. Restored, totally submerged deciduous molar. Case report. Aust Dent J 1982;27:27-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Rygh P, Reitan K. Changes in the supporting tissues of submerged deciduous molars with and without permanent successors. Odont Scand J 1964;72:345-62.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Altay N, Cengiz SB. Space-regaining treatment for a submerged primary molar: A case report. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:286-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Steigman S, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E, Matrai Y. Relationship of submerged deciduous molars to root resorption and development of permanent successors. J Dent Res 1974;53:88-93.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Memarpour M, Rahimi M, Bagheri A, Mina K. Unerupted primary molar teeth positioned inferior to the permanent premolar: A case report. J Dent (Tehran) 2012;9:79-82.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Cate T. Orbans Oral Histology and Embryology. 7 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1972. p. 329.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Thornton M, Zimmerman E. Ankylosis of primary teeth. J Dent Child 1964;31:120-6.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Biederman W. The ankylosed tooth. Dent Clin N Am 1964;493-508.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.McDonald RE, Avery DR, Jeffrey A. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 8 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1983. p. 116-21.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Malhotra N, Kundabala M, Acharaya S. A review of root fractures: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Dent Update 2011;38:615-6, 619.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Gündüz K, Muðlali M, Inal S. Total impaction of deciduous maxillary molars: Two case reports. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:64-71.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.de Oliveira BH, Campos V, Marçal S. Compound odontoma - Diagnosis and treatment: Three case reports. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:151-7.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Veis A, Tziafas D, Lambrianidis T. A case report of a compound odontoma causing delayed eruption of a central maxillary incisor: Clinical and microscopic evaluation. J Endod 2000;26:477-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction and...
Case Report
Intra Oral Exami...
Radiographic Exa...
Diagnosis
Treatment Objectives
Surgical Operation
Post-Surgical Fo...
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3005    
    Printed116    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1008    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal