Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size   Users Online: 622
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 23

Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns


1 Department of Developmental Sciences-Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Lebanon
2 Department of Oral Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Lebanon

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jamal Y Amer
Baakline – Chouf, Mount Lebanon
Lebanon
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17

Rights and Permissions

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic orthodontic brackets and zirconia crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty zirconia specimens were computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milled, sintered, glazed, and embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the surface treatment applied: C: no surface treatment (control), S: sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3, and D: Sof-Lex disc roughening. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: P: Clearfil Ceramic Primer + Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray) and R: RelyX U200 (3M/ESPE). Metallic orthodontic brackets were bonded to the labial surface of the specimens. All specimens underwent thermocycling. SBS test was applied using a universal test machine at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Subgroup SP showed the highest SBS (20.8 ± 4.8 MPa), followed by subgroups SR (16.7 ± 4.6 MPa), DP (12.3 ± 2.8 MPa), and DR (11.6 ± 3 MPa). However, all specimens in the control group underwent debonding during thermocycling. The different surface treatment groups showed highly significant differences (P < 0.05), whereas the resin cement subgroups showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SBS between glazed zirconia crowns and metallic brackets strongly depended on the surface treatment applied. Sandblasting achieved the highest SBS. Roughening with Sof-Lex disc proved to be a reliable surface treatment modality for glazed zirconia. Bonding to untreated glazed zirconia surfaces led to bond failure. Both resin cements yielded strong SBS results.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed192    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded61    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal