Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size   Users Online: 373
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

    Article Cited by others

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A comparative evaluation of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with skeletal anchored and conventional facemask protraction therapy

Tripathi Tulika, Rai Priyank, Singh Navneet, Kalra Shilpa

Year : 2016| Volume: 5| Issue : 3 | Page no: 92-99

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class III growing patients with severe space deficiency: A report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction
Hung-Ying Lin,Hsiang Yang,Eddie Hsiang-Hua Lai,Shih-Ying Lin,Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2019;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects
Roberta Clemente,Luca Contardo,Christian Greco,Roberto Di Lenarda,Giuseppe Perinetti
BioMed Research International. 2018; 2018: 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]

 

Read this article