|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 86-90
Effect of different intracoronal bleaching methods on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to bleached enamel: An in-vitro study
Vikas Chauhan, Piush Kumar, Payal Sharma, Divya Shetty
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Web Publication||29-Jun-2017|
A-139, Sector - 26 Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh - 201 301
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different intracoronal bleaching methods on the shear bond strength and site of failure of ceramic brackets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted human maxillary incisors were randomly divided into four groups (n = 15). Endodontic access cavity was prepared and root canals were filled, root fillings were removed 2mm apical to the cementoenamel junction, and a 2-mmthick layer of glass ionomer cement base was applied. Group 1 served as the control. Intracoronal bleaching was performed with 35% carbamide peroxide in group 2, sodium perborate in group 3, and 37.5% hydrogen peroxide in group 4. The teeth were immersed in artificial saliva for 4 weeks before bracket bonding. Ceramic brackets were bonded with composite resin and cured with LED light. After bonding, the shear bond strength of the brackets was tested with a universal testing machine. The site of bond failure was determined by modified ARI (Adhesive Remnant Index).
RESULTS: The highest value of shear bond strength was measured in control group (18.67 ± 1.59 MPa), which was statistically significant from groups 2,3, and 4. There was no significant difference between groups 2 and 4. The lowest shear bond strength was measured in group 3. ARI scores were not significant from each other.
CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronal bleaching significantly affected the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets even after 4 weeks of bleaching. Bleaching with sodium perborate affects shear bond strength more adversely than does bleaching with other agents like hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide.
Keywords: Ceramic brackets, enamel bonding, intracoronal bleaching, shear bond strength
|How to cite this article:|
Chauhan V, Kumar P, Sharma P, Shetty D. Effect of different intracoronal bleaching methods on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to bleached enamel: An in-vitro study. J Orthodont Sci 2017;6:86-90
|How to cite this URL:|
Chauhan V, Kumar P, Sharma P, Shetty D. Effect of different intracoronal bleaching methods on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to bleached enamel: An in-vitro study. J Orthodont Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Aug 5];6:86-90. Available from: https://www.jorthodsci.org/text.asp?2017/6/3/86/209173
| Introduction|| |
Facial esthetics plays a major role in our life not only for enhancing our social skills but also in creating job opportunities. Discoloration of teeth is one of the major aesthetic concerns of dental patients. Discoloredteeth, especiallyinthe anterior region, can cause considerable cosmetic impairment.
Tooth discoloration may be classified as intrinsic or extrinsic. The main intrinsic factors for discoloration are pulp hemorrhage, decomposition of pulp, bacteria and its products, tetracycline, pulp necrosis, intracanal medicaments, some endodontic filling materials, metallic restorations, and also by incorporation of chromatogenic material into dentin and enamel during odotogenesis or after eruption.
Intracoronal bleaching is a conservative alternative to more invasive non-vital aesthetic treatments such as crowning or the placement of veneers on discolored teeth.
The bleaching agents most commonly used for internal tooth bleaching are carbamide peroxide, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium perborate. Over the years, various authors have demonstrated that intracoronal bleaching agents produce changes in enamel structure and composition, which may affect the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Hydrogen peroxide is the active component for various bleaching agents used in dentistry. It may be applied directly or produced by a chemical reaction from sodium perborate or carbamide peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide acts as a strong oxidizing agent through the formation of reactive oxygen molecules. These reactive molecules attack long-chained, dark coloredchromophore molecule, and split them into smaller, less colored, and more diffusible molecules. The compromised bonding after bleaching has been attributed to the inhibition of polymerization as a result of this residual oxygen.
Carbamide peroxide gel provides 25% to 35% hydrogen peroxide equivalent and its effect on human enamel composition and topography has been studied by Covington et al., and their results suggested a controlled oxidation process in which the organic phase of the enamel is mobilized without producing grossly unacceptable enamel surface topography.
Sodium perborate is an oxidizing agent available as a powder. In the presence of water, it breaks down to form sodium metaborate, hydrogen peroxide, and nascent oxygen. Water-based sodium perborate paste has been reported to be less harmful to dental tissues.
Ceramic orthodontic brackets were introduced in 1987 as a more aesthetic alternative to stainless steel brackets. Ceramic brackets demonstrate superior aesthetics, biocompatibility, and resistance to physical and chemical factors and are reported to have greater or equal bond strength as stainless steel brackets. These brackets allow the curing light to transmit through them and thus there may be a better polymerization.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different intracoronal bleaching methods on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to bleached enamel. The null hypothesis considered was that there was no difference between the bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded before and after bleaching with different intracoronal bleaching methods.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Sixty freshly extracted non-carious human maxillary incisors with intact labial surface and no pre-treatment with any chemical agent were used for the study. After extraction, maxillary incisor teeth were washed under running tap water and stored in a solution of 0.1% (weight/volume) thymol till use. Each tooth was embedded in an auto-polymerizing acrylic resin.
Endodontic access cavity was prepared and biomechanical preparation was done for all the teeth. Thorough irrigation was performed using 2.5% sodium hypochloride and root canal was dried with sterile paper points. The canal was obturated with root canal sealer and gutta-percha points. After obturation, the root canal filling was removed 2mm apical to the cementoenamel junction and a 2-mm thick layer of glass ionomer cement was applied.
All the samples were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15 in each group), as follows:
- Group 1: The access cavity was rinsed with distilled water and dried and the final composite restoration was placed
- Group 2: Intracoronal bleaching was performed with 35% carbamide peroxide
- Group 3: Intracoronal bleaching was performed with sodium perborate
- Group 4: Intracoronal bleaching was performed with 37.5% hydrogen peroxide.
Bleaching agent was placed into the cavity and the cavity was closed by temporary filling material. This procedure was repeated a further two times (once every four days). After 12 days, the temporary filling was removed and the access cavity was rinsed with distilled water and restored with composite. The teeth were immersed in artificial saliva for 4 weeks before bracket bonding.
The teeth were cleaned with non-fluoridated pumice, rinsed thoroughly with water, and dried with oil and moisture-free compressed air. After that 37% of phosphoric acid gel was applied to the labial surface of each tooth for 15 seconds and the tooth was thoroughly rinsed and dried. A frosted appearance was taken as obvious proof of success in etching. A thin uniform layer of Transbond XT primer was applied to the etched enamel and was lightly blown with oil and moisture free compressed air and then cured for 5 seconds. The Ortho Organizer illusion plus ceramic bracket was used. After that, Transbond XT plus adhesive was applied to the bracket base and placed onto the labial enamel surface and pressed firmly into place to express adhesive from the margins of the bracket base. The excess adhesive was removed. Light curing was done for 10 seconds from all sides.
Each specimen was loaded onto a Computerised Instron Universal Testing Machine (Asian Group Inc; Model no. 6578) with the long axis of the specimen kept perpendicular to the direction of the applied force. The standard knife edge was positioned in the occluso-gingival direction and in contact with the bonded specimen. Bond strength was determined in the shear mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fractured occurred. The values of failure load (N) were recorded and converted into megapascal (MPa) by dividing the failure load (N) by the surface area of by the bracket base which was 9.03 mm 2 according to manufacturer.
After debonding, the teeth were examined under a stereomicroscope (10×). Adhesive remaining after bracket removal was assessed according to the modified adhesive remnant index. The data recorded was subjected to statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD multiple comparison tests were used to compare shear bond strength among the groups. The Chi-square test was used to determine differences inARI (Adhesive Remnant Index) scores among groups. Significance for all statistical tests was predetermined at P < 0.05. All statistics were performed with SPSS version 20.0.
| Results|| |
Descriptive statistics of various groups are presented in [Table 1] and [Figure 1].
|Table 1: Descriptive statistics for shear bond strength of various groups|
Click here to view
On comparison of the mean shear bond strength of four groups, group 1 had maximum bond strength (18.67 ± 1.59MPa), followed by group 2 (15.85 ± 1.84 MPa), group 4 (15.26 ± 1.21 MPa);group 3 (12.65 ± 1.29 MPa) had the minimum bond strength.
ANOVA suggested a significant difference between the groups. The P value was found to be <0.001 so the difference of means between four groups was statistically highly significant, [Table 2].
On multiple comparisons by Tukey HSD test, group 1showed highest values of bond strength and the bond strength was significantly higher when compared with groups 2, 3, and 4. The lowest shear bond strength was observed in group 3. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 4, [Table 2].
Chi-square analysis showed that the ARI scores for the various test groups were not significant from each other;χ2 df = 3 = 1.796, P = 0.616 [Table 3].
| Discussion|| |
In our study, the lowest bond strength was observed when bleaching was done with sodium perborate. The bond strength of groups bleached with hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide was higher than the sodium perborate group. The control group showed the highest bond strength. These results are in accordance with a study by Gungor et al. who found that sodium perborate had more effect in reducing the bond strength, while carbamide peroxide and hydrogen peroxideboth showed similar effects. They had also reported that the control group had the highest bond strength. Abdulkareem et al. in their study reported similar findings with stainless steel brackets but in case of ceramic brackets they found no significant difference in the bond strength between bleached and unbleached enamel. Cakmak et al. and Amaral et al. have also reported no significant difference in bond strength between bleached and unbleached enamel after 7 days and 30 days of bleaching., The probable reason for this might be that those two studies had used sodium perborate mixed with distilled water as compared to our study where sodium perborate was mixed with hydrogen peroxide for bleaching. Abdulkareem et al., explained that the insignificant effect of bleaching on the bond strength of ceramic brackets could be due to the following: (1) the presence of zirconia particles coating the bracket base creates millions of undercuts that secure the bracket in place, by micromechanical retention means, (2) due to the translucency that monocrystalline bracketsprovides, itgives a better chance for complete polymerization of the adhesive with light curing, (3) monocrystalline brackets are hard and offer great strength that prevents or reduces the peeling effects that may occur during brackets debonding, thus gives them high shear bond strength values.
Most authors concluded that bleaching adversely affects the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when the bonding procedure is performed immediately or even if it is delayed by upto 1 month.,,,,,
Toko et al. have given a hypothesis according to which the adverse effect of hydrogen peroxide may be attributed to the removal of non-fibres organic content within the tooth substance. Hydrogen peroxide has also been suspected to cause denaturation of proteins in the organic component of dentin and enamel, thus altering the organic–inorganic ratio with an increase in organic component.
In contrast, Bishara et al. and Uysal et al. contraindicated the effect of bleaching on bond strength and reported no significant difference in bond strength of bleached and unbleached enamel when 10% carbamide peroxide or 35% hydrogen peroxide was used.,, Mishima et al. and Oltu et al. in their studies have corroborated these findings., Oztağ et al. also reported that bleaching agents that contain 20% carbamide peroxide did not affect the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets when bonding was performed 24 hours or 14 days after bleaching.
These variations in the results of various studies have been explained due to the difference in the post-bleaching period before the samples were tested for bond strength. Studies that reported no adverse effect of bleaching on bond strength evaluated bond strength after 24 hours to 30 days post-bleaching, which may have reversed any change due to bleaching.,, Also, these studies have showed varying concentration of bleaching agents, which have resulted in difference in the results. Bishara et al. reported that a delay of at least 2 weeks is needed after bleaching for the tooth structure to regain its pre-bleaching adhesive properties.
Bulut et al., Uysal et al., and Mishima et al reported that the bond strength that had been reduced post-bleaching was restored 30 days after the immersion of specimens in artificial saliva.,, The recovery of reduced bond strength may have been caused by the removal of residual oxygen and residual peroxide or peroxide-related substances released from the bleached enamel during the immersion process. Firoozmand et al. reported a reduction in bond strength of polycrystalline ceramic brackets even after 14 days of bleaching.
Although numerous studies have investigated extracoronal bleaching, we have found only few studies that investigated the effect of intracoronal bleaching treatment on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with orthodontic composites to enamel.,,,, There are only a couple of studies that investigated the effect of intracoronal bleaching treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. One of these studies was done by Abdulkareem et al. who did their study on sapphire brackets and another study was done by Cakmak et al.,
ARI scores are used to define the site of bond failure between the enamel, adhesive, and bracket base. Bond failures within the adhesive or at the bracket-adhesive interface are preferred because they decrease shear force stress at the enamel surface and increase the probability of maintaining an undamaged enamel surface. ARI scores of our study indicated that the most common site of bond failure was at the bracket/adhesive interface or within the adhesive in all the groups except hydrogen peroxide group, which showed bond failure closer to the enamel/adhesive interface and the difference was not statistically significant. Bond failure at the bracket/adhesive interface and within the adhesive found in this study is similar to other studies evaluating bond strength to bleached enamel.
| Conclusions|| |
Intracoronal bleaching significantly affected the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets even after 30 days of bleaching. Bleaching with sodium perborate affects shear bond strength more adversely than does other bleaching agents. Hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide are the preferable agents where bleaching has to be followed by orthodontic bonding.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Gungor AY, Ozcan E, Alkis H, Turkkaharaman H. Effects of different bleaching methods on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2013;83:686-90.
Uysal T, OzgurEr, Sagsen B, Ustdal A, Akdogan G. Can intracoronally bleached teeth be bonded safely? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:689-94.
Gungor AY, Ozcan E, Alkis H, Turkkahraman H. Effects of different intracoronal bleaching methods on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2012;82:942-6.
Ferreira NS, Rosa PCF, Ferreira RDJ, Valera MC. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on the tooth surface after internal bleaching. Rev Odontol UNESP 2014;43:209-13.
Turkkahraman H, Adanir N, Gungor AY. Bleaching and desensitizer application effects on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2007;77:489-93.
Miles PG, Pontier J, Bahiraei D, Close J. The effect of carbamide peroxide bleach on the tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets: An in vitro
study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:371-5.
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Stifanelli P, Scribante A, Catherine K. The effect of bleaching on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:83-7.
Cakmak F, Kocak S, Kocak MM, Turk SE, Turk T. Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either Self-Etching Primer or Conventional Method After Intracoronal Bleaching. Turkish J Orthod 2015;28:48-54.
Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of Scotchbond Multipurpose and maleic acid as alternative methods of bonding orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:498-501.
Abdulkareem MR, Al-Mulla AA. Effects of three different types of intracoronal bleaching agents on shear bond strength of stainless steel and sapphire brackets bonded to endodontically treated teeth. J BaghColl Dent 2014;26:149-55.
Amaral C, Jorge A, Veloso K, Erhardt M, Arias V, Rodrigues JA. The effect of in-office in combination with intracoronal bleaching on enamel and dentin bond strength and dentin morphology. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;5:17-24.
Josey AL, Meyers IA, Romaniuk K, Symons AL. The effect of a vital bleaching technique on enamel surface morphology and the bonding of composite resin to enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:244-50.
Uysal T, Sisman A. Can previously bleached teeth be bonded safely using self-etching primer systems? Angle Orthod 2008;78:711-5.
Shinohara MS, Peris AR, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta LA, Ambrosano GM. The effect of non vital bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite resin using three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:205-9.
Uysal T, Basciftci FA, Usumez S, Sari Z, Buyukerkmen A. Can previously bleached teeth be bonded safely? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:628-32.
Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Soliman MM, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. The effect of tooth bleaching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:755-60.
Bishara SE, Sulieman AH, Olson M. Effect of enamel bleaching on the bonding strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:444-7.
Mishima FD, Valentim RGA, Araujo MTS, Ruellas ACO, Sant'Anna EF. The effect of tooth bleaching on the enamel surface and the tensile force to debond orthodontic brackets. J Orthod 2009;36:236-42.
Oltu U, Gurgan S. Effects of the three concentrations of carbamide peroxide on the structure of enamel. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:332-40.
Oztağ E, Bagdelen G, Kilicoglu H, Ulukapi H, Aydin I. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:232-7.
Bulut H, Turkun M, Kaya AD. Effect of an antioxidizing agent on the shear bond strength of bracket bonded to bleached human enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:266-72.
Firoozmand LM, Brandão JV, Fialho MP. Influence of microhybrid resin and etching times on bleached enamel for the bonding of ceramic brackets. Braz Oral Res 2013;27:142-8.
Fernandes HO, Santos LB, Firoozmand LM. Shear bond strength of an orthodontic self-etching adhesive after intracoronary bleaching. OrthodCraniofac Res 2015;18:117-24.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Effect of different bleaching treatment protocols on shear bond strength of bonded orthodontic brackets with no-primer adhesive resin
| ||Saeid Sadeghian,Shirin Garavand,Amin Davoudi |
| ||journal of orthodontic science. 2021; 10(1): 11 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Role of enamel and dentin on color changes after internal bleaching associated or not with external bleaching
| ||Tauan Rosa SANTANA,Rafaella Mariana Fontes de BRAGANÇA,Ana Claudia Conceição CORREIA,Isadora de Melo OLIVEIRA,André Luis FARIA-E-SILVA |
| ||Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2021; 29 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||In vitro Assessment of Influence of Various Bleaching Protocols on the Strength of Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets bonded to Bleached Tooth Surface: A Comparative Study
| ||Manish Goutam,Divya Iska,Madhvi Singh,Rajkiran Chitumalla,Sai C Bala Balasubramanian |
| ||The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2017; 18(12): 1181 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|