Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size   Users Online: 152
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

    Article Cited by others


The effect of using CBCT in the diagnosis of canine impaction and its impact on the orthodontic treatment outcome

Alqerban Ali, Jacobs Reinhilde, van Keirsbilck Pieter-Jan, Aly Medhat, Swinnen Steven, Fieuws Steffen, Willems Guy

Year : 2014| Volume: 3| Issue : 2 | Page no: 34-40

   This article has been cited by
1 Evaluation of Impacted Maxillary Canine Position Using Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Wafa Alfaleh,Sarah Al Thobiani
The Saudi Dental Journal. 2020;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Evaluation of impacted canines’ localization and adjacent lateral incisors’ root resorption with orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography
Sibel Akkuc,Gulsum Duruk,Sacide Duman
Oral Radiology. 2020;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Prediction of maxillary canine impaction based on panoramic radiographs
Raes Margot,Cadenas De Llano-Pérula Maria,Alqerban Ali,Laenen Annouschka,Verdonck Anna,Willems Guy
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2019;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
Ahmad Abdelkarim
Dentistry Journal. 2019; 7(3): 89
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 Age as a limiting factor for panoramic imaging in patients with ectopic maxillary canines
Ulrich Kritzler
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2019; 156(1): 8
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 Editorial 1/2018
Ralf K W Schulze
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2018; 47(2): 20170359
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
7 Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies
Ehsan Eslami,Hamid Barkhordar,Kenneth Abramovitch,Jessica Kim,Mohamed I. Masoud
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017; 151(2): 248
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
8 CBCT imaging vs conventional radiography
Katja Kritzler
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017; 152(2): 146
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
9 Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement
Anne Caroline Oenning,Reinhilde Jacobs,Ruben Pauwels,Andreas Stratis,Mihaela Hedesiu,Benjamin Salmon
Pediatric Radiology. 2017;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
10 Impacted and transmigrant mandibular canines incidence, aetiology, and treatment: a systematic review
Domenico Dalessandri,Simone Parrini,Rachele Rubiano,Diletta Gallone,Marco Migliorati
European Journal of Orthodontics. 2016;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
11 The effect of canine disimpaction performed with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) before comprehensive orthodontic treatment to avoid root resorption of adjacent teeth
Farzin Heravi,Hooman Shafaee,Ali Forouzanfar,Seyed Hossein Hoseini Zarch,Mohsen Merati
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2016; 21(2): 65
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
12 Determination of size-specific exposure settings in dental cone-beam CT
Ruben Pauwels,Reinhilde Jacobs,Ria Bogaerts,Hilde Bosmans,Soontra Panmekiate
European Radiology. 2016;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
13 Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics?
Daniela G. Garib,Louise Resti Calil,Claudia Resende Leal,Guilherme Janson
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2014; 19(5): 136
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article